![]() Additional Means To Prevent OEMs From Distributing Navigator. ![]() Contractual Restrictions And Coercion Of OEMs.Excluding Navigator From The OEM Channel.Denying Netscape Access To Crucial Channels Of Distribution.The Attempt To Obtain Agreement With Netscape.There are no other related cases currently pending in this Court or in any other court. This case was previously before this Court in Nos.References to the rulings at issue appear in the Brief for Appellant.All parties, intervenors and amici appearing before the district court and in this court are listed in the Brief for Appellant.ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTīRIEF FOR APPELLEES UNITED STATES AND THE STATE PLAINTIFFSĬERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., 00-5212, 00-5213 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 26-27, 2001 For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |